Here are the problems with his reasoning.
1. If tolerance for sinful conduct did in fact equate to true love, then the same arguments made about accepting and embracing homosexuals, would have to also apply to pedophiles, arsonists, terrorists and any and all persons. Taken to its logical conclusion then, the jailing of any criminal, the condemning of any terrorist act, the pointing out of any sin or immoral conduct of any other person would violate charity as the commenter tried to apply the term here. In fact, ironically, the commenter's inference of evil on my part, for pointing out the immoral nature of homosexual conduct and the fact that it has no place in Scouting, would also be a violation of charity. Thus, in judging me for judging the homosexuals, the commenter, violates his own skewed logic and condemns himself.
2. True love, does not, and never will, equate to tolerance of evil. True love, the love that Paul really spoke about, would actually motivate all true Christians, who love and serve the master, to take the steps necessary to teach those in sin's path, that they are in fact in sin's path, and to do everything they can to help the sinner recognize the sin, so that they may repent and be saved. It is NOT an act of love toward sinners, to pat them on the back and say , "go ahead and sin, all will be well with you." Imagine the final judgment when the person so deceived by one who ought to have loved them enough to try and save them, asks pointedly, "Why, Why didn't you warn me, teach me, try to redeem me". In fact Christ's divine commission requires judgment like that this commenter condemns, as does fulfillment of Paul's teaching; "for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?"
3. Finally, it is a fact that most liberals, who desire to be god rather than serve God, will pass judgment on all those who appropriately judge conduct to be sinful and immoral. Twisting the scriptures to fit their human interpretations they ignore the fact that the same God who taught Paul the deep truths of real Charity, was the one who destroyed the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. No doubt the commenter here, will join many other critics of God, and judge those actions to be harsh and loveless, like the command from God to kill all the Amalekites of whatever age. But by such action they reveal themselves to be self-deified and lacking in any deep understanding or eternal perspective. Those in tune with the real spirit, the Holy Ghost, will see, that Jehovah's actions in those cases was actually a form of true love toward countless future generations keeping them from having to be born into the filth of those cities and to be corrupted and destroyed thereby. God's apparent harshness, was in fact real love. Similarly, the actions of many truly moral and God loving Saints, may appear harsh to the self serving liberals, but those actions are really done with deep and lasting love and a yearning desire to save their brothers and sisters from a destructive lifestyle, and pattern of conduct that will in the end rob them of exaltation and eternal life, if they do not repent.
The fact is that only those willing to take a moral stand, to point out immorality wherever it exists, and to strive to keep others from being deceived by the touch feely liberal tolerance that is in reality only hatred, are the ones who are TRULY living the law of Charity. So to answer the commenter's question the answer is yes. I have disassociated myself from the BSA precisely because their actions will hurt God's children who I truly love, and may lead many of them into degrading and spiritually destructive lifestyles that they otherwise might have avoided, if the BSA had taken a firm, loving, moral stand